Somewhere along the way, having multiple streams of income became a personality trait.
You have your job.
Your side hustle.
Your weekend gig.
Your freelance work.
Your online store.
Your passive income.
Your passive income’s side hustle.
And to be clear, I understand the appeal.
There are plenty of reasons to want more than one source of income.
Maybe you’re building a business.
Maybe you want to invest.
Maybe you’re saving for something.
Maybe you want more financial freedom.
Maybe you have a skill you enjoy monetizing.
Maybe you just like making money.
Nothing wrong with that.
But I do think we’ve blurred the line between wanting multiple streams of income and needing multiple jobs to survive.
Because those are not the same thing.
If somebody works 40 hours a week and still needs DoorDash, Uber, freelance work, overtime, weekend shifts, an online store, or some other source of income just to cover rent, groceries, transportation, utilities, and regular life…
Is that entrepreneurship?
Or did we just give underpayment better branding?
At Some Point, We Have to Discuss Job #1
We give people a lot of advice about what to do when their money isn’t enough.
Start a side hustle.
Monetize your skills.
Pick up extra shifts.
Drive after work.
Sell something online.
Get a certification.
Find another stream of income.
Wake up earlier.
Use your weekends.
And sometimes that is perfectly reasonable advice.
But I have a question.
When do we examine the job that is already taking 40 hours of the week?
Because if the solution to working full-time is to work more…
at some point, we have to discuss Job #1.
But It’s Not Always the Job
This is where the conversation gets more complicated.
Because needing more money doesn’t automatically mean you’re underpaid.
You can make $100,000 and spend $120,000.
No amount of economic analysis is going to save us from math.
Sometimes the problem really is spending.
Sometimes we want a lifestyle our current income doesn’t support.
Sometimes the extra work is funding vacations, expensive hobbies, investments, a business, or a financial goal.
That’s different.
So maybe there are at least three different conversations hiding underneath the phrase “I need a side hustle.”
There’s:
The lifestyle problem.
I make enough to reasonably support myself, but I’m spending beyond what I make.
Then there’s:
The ambition.
My primary income supports my life, but I want more money, more options, more freedom, or something I’m intentionally building toward.
And then there’s:
The income problem.
I work full-time and my income still does not reasonably cover ordinary living expenses.
Those are three very different situations.
But somehow our cultural response to all three has become:
Get another stream of income.
What Exactly Makes It a Career?
This is the part I keep coming back to.
If you need a second job to afford your life, what exactly makes the first one a career?
Technically, nothing about the word “career” guarantees a particular salary.
I know that.
But culturally, we’ve attached something to the idea.
A career is supposed to represent some level of stability.
Advancement.
Professional development.
Benefits.
Experience.
Building something over time.
So what happens when you have the degree, the title, the résumé, the 40-hour schedule, the performance reviews, the meetings, the professional clothes, and the LinkedIn profile…
and you still have to clock into Job #2 on Saturday morning to keep everything running?
At what point do we stop asking why you don’t have another income stream…
and start asking why the first one isn’t enough?
When Did Exhaustion Become Ambition?
I think this is the part that bothers me.
Not that people work multiple jobs.
People have done that forever.
Not that people want more money.
Of course we do.
It’s the way we sometimes package having to work constantly as ambition.
If you work your regular job and then spend your evenings building something you genuinely want, that may be ambition.
If you work your regular job and spend your evenings working another job because the first paycheck can’t cover your basic expenses…
I’m not sure those are the same story.
One might be about building more.
The other might simply be about not having enough.
And calling both of them “hustle” makes that distinction really easy to ignore.
What Are Your Extra Streams Actually Doing?
Maybe that’s the question worth asking.
Not:
Should everybody have multiple streams of income?
There probably isn’t one answer to that.
Instead:
What are your additional streams of income doing for you?
Are they building wealth?
Creating options?
Funding a dream?
Helping you leave a job?
Paying for something you intentionally chose?
Giving you freedom?
Or are all of your extra streams simply pouring into the same hole because one full-time paycheck isn’t enough to maintain an ordinary life?
Because those may look identical from the outside.
Two people can both work a full-time job and drive Uber at night.
One may be using that money to build a business.
The other may need it to make rent.
Same behavior.
Very different reality.
So Maybe We’re Asking the Wrong Question
We spend a lot of time asking people:
What’s your side hustle?
Maybe sometimes we should ask:
Why do you need one?
Because multiple streams of income can absolutely be a strategy.
They can create freedom.
They can reduce dependence on one employer.
They can help build wealth.
They can fund the next version of your life.
But needing multiple jobs simply to maintain the current version of your life is a different conversation.
And maybe the question isn’t whether you should have multiple streams of income.
Maybe it’s whether those streams are building the life you want…
or whether you’re using all of them just to keep the one you already have afloat.
Come think with me.
Leave a comment